Adolescent Pregnancy Outcomes and Risk Factors

Jana Diabelková, Conceptualization , Methodology , Formal analysis , Resources , Data curation , Writing – original draft , Visualization , 1 Kvetoslava Rimárová, Conceptualization , Supervision , Funding acquisition , 1 Erik Dorko, Supervision , Project administration , Funding acquisition , 1, * Peter Urdzík, Conceptualization , Investigation , Data curation , 2 Andrea Houžvičková, Methodology , Formal analysis , 1 and Ľubica Argalášová, Supervision , Project administration 3

Jana Diabelková

1 Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Medical Faculty, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, Šrobárova 2, 041 80 Košice, Slovakia

Kvetoslava Rimárová

1 Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Medical Faculty, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, Šrobárova 2, 041 80 Košice, Slovakia

Erik Dorko

1 Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Medical Faculty, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, Šrobárova 2, 041 80 Košice, Slovakia

Peter Urdzík

2 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, Louis Pasteur University Hospital, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11 Košice, Slovakia

Andrea Houžvičková

1 Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Medical Faculty, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, Šrobárova 2, 041 80 Košice, Slovakia

Ľubica Argalášová

3 Institute of Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Špitálska 24, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia

1 Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Medical Faculty, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, Šrobárova 2, 041 80 Košice, Slovakia

2 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, Louis Pasteur University Hospital, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11 Košice, Slovakia

3 Institute of Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Špitálska 24, 813 72 Bratislava, Slovakia

Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Associated Data

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Abstract

One of the major social and public health problems in the world is adolescent pregnancy. Adolescent pregnancy is strongly associated to less favorable results for both the mother and the newborn. We conducted this research to ascertain the impact of teenage age on neonatal outcomes and also observed the lifestyles of pregnant teenage girls. We conducted a study of 2434 mothers aged ≤19 years (n = 294) or 20–34 years (n = 2140) who gave birth in 2019–2020 at the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Louis Pasteur University Hospital in Košice. The data on mothers and newborn infants have been reported from the reports on mothers at childbirth. Women between the ages of 20 and 34 served as the reference group. The teenage mothers were more likely to become pregnant if they were unmarried (OR = 14.2; 95% CI = 9.3–21.6; p < 0.001) and had a basic education or lack of education (OR = 16.8; 95% CI = 11.5–24.6; p < 0.001). Additionally, they were more likely to smoke when pregnant (OR = 5.0; 95% CI = 3.8–6.6; p < 0.001). Low birth weight was more common in newborns born to adolescent mothers than in those born to adult mothers (p < 0.001). Our findings showed that infants of teenage mothers often had lower birth weights (−332.6 g, p < 0.001). Adolescent mothers were associated with lower Apgar scores at the first minute (p = 0.003). As compared with the control group, pregnant teenage girls had a greater prevalence of preterm deliveries in our research (p = 0.004). This study finds significant age-related disparities in neonatal outcomes between mothers. These results might be used to identify vulnerable groups who need special assistance and actions to reduce the probability of negative outcomes for such groups.

Keywords: teenage pregnancy, adolescent pregnancy, birth weight, preterm birth, neonatal outcomes, risk factors

1. Introduction

Adolescent pregnancies are a global public health problem. Teenage pregnancy is the pregnancy of 10- to 19-year-old girls [1]. Adolescents are further divided into early (10–14 years old), middle (15–17 years old), and late adolescents (over 17 years old) [2].

According to the World Health Organization, adolescent pregnancies are a global problem for both developed and developing countries. Although the global teenage birth rate has decreased, there are regional differences in the rates of change. Adolescent pregnancies have decreased globally, from 64.5 per 1000 women in 2000 to 42.5 per 1000 women in 2021. However, there are huge differences in levels between and within countries. While the estimated global teenage birth rate has decreased, the actual number of childbirths to teenagers continues to be high. Pregnancy in girls under the age of 19 is severe in every aspect and requires very complex and long-term solutions [1].

The transition from childhood to adulthood occurs during the phase of adolescence, during which there are numerous changes in the physiological, anatomical, structural, and psychological aspects. Because many teenagers are not physically or mentally prepared for pregnancy and childbirth, they are more likely to experience complications that can have serious health consequences. Giving birth during adolescence has serious consequences for the health of the mother and her infant [1]. The adolescent age group is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes [2,3].

The rate of teenage pregnancies has recently been greatly affected by several significant factors. The decreasing age at menarche is one of the factors that can affect a woman’s fertility. Since the 19th century, the age at menarche has been decreasing at a rate of 2–3 months per decade in many European countries, resulting in an overall decrease of about 3 years. Most of the decrease in menarche age is related to better nutrition and health. The onset of first sexual activity occurs at a significantly younger age, which is another contributing element. Teenage pregnancy, therefore, remains a serious social, economic, and health problem [4].

Young maternal age is more likely a marker for one or more other maternal risk factors associated with poor birth outcomes. Poverty, low education, and inadequate family support are also problems. These factors increase the risk of sexually transmitted infections, unsafe abortions, and birth complications, all of which are exacerbated by inadequate prenatal care [5]. For girls, early pregnancies can have social consequences such as lower status in the household and community; stigmatization; abuse by family, peers, and partners; and early and forced marriage. Early pregnancy and childbirth during adolescence can hinder a girl’s otherwise healthy development into adulthood and negatively affect her educational opportunities, financial security, and health. Many teenage girls who are pregnant cannot continue their education or work because they are pregnant. This can have a big impact on their future [6]. In addition, children born to parents who cannot care for them face additional dangers. In the first few years of a child’s life, the mother–child relationship declines. This is primarily due to the mother’s immaturity. When teenage mothers are victims of sexual assault, the situation is even worse. Apart from their mothers, these children tend to be brought up by their grandparents and relatives, with frequent changes in caregivers. Children have a higher risk of being abused or neglected and a higher risk of failing in school and are more likely to engage in criminal behavior later on [7].

The economic, social, and political development and progress of any country depend on the healthy size of adolescents and children. As a result, the healthier the teenager is, the healthier the nation and future generations will be. Teenagers thus need special attention from us.

Understanding the issue is necessary to develop and carry out prevention initiatives to decrease teen pregnancy. Knowledge about the target groups, teenage pregnancy and birth outcomes, and the risk and preventive factors related to teenage pregnancy is needed. This information is important in choosing which risk and protective factors to target and, thus, better implementing the effective implementation of evidence-based adolescent pregnancy prevention practices.

Examining the newborn outcomes and risk variables associated with adolescent pregnancies was the aim of the present research.

2. Materials and Methods

The research took place in the years 2019–2020 in eastern Slovakia. This study included 2434 newborns and their mothers. Data were collected at the University of Pavel Jozef Šafárik’s Faculty of Medicine and the Louis Pasteur University Hospital’s Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic in Košice. This hospital has a higher prevalence of mothers with high-risk pregnancies because it is the East Slovakian center for low birth weight and preterm birth.

The data were obtained from hospital records. Available information included the mother’s education, marital status, lifestyle, and when prenatal care began. Additionally, the Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, the newborn’s gestational age, and the newborn’s weight were recorded. The total number of mothers in the results tables was different because not all the data for each mother were available in the clinical records. The study excluded women who were carriers of multiple pregnancies because they had a higher risk of preterm birth and lower birth weights of their newborns. Thus, women with multiple pregnancies were not included among the participants.

Maternal age was defined as the mother’s age in completed years at the time of delivery. The youngest women recruited to the cohort were 14 years old; therefore, the data for this study were limited to women aged 14–34 years at delivery who had a singleton pregnancy. The results for women under the age of 19 were compared with the results for women in the reference group (20–34 years). The age range of 20 to 34 years was chosen as the reference group because this age range had the lowest risk of developing age-related problems.

In our records, a woman who smoked at least one cigarette per day while pregnant was considered a smoker. All women who consumed 15 g of alcohol per day were considered alcohol consumers. This is equivalent to 0.5 L of 12-degree beer, 0.3 L of wine, or 0.5 dL of strong alcohol.

The neonatal outcome variables of interest in this study were low birth weight (less than 2500 g), very low birth weight (less than 1500 g), extremely low birth weight (less than 1000 g), macrosomia (birth weight greater than 4000 g), preterm birth (less than 37 weeks gestation), very preterm birth (less than 32 weeks gestation), extremely preterm birth (less than 28 weeks gestation), and low Apgar score at the first and fifth minutes (less than 7).

Most mothers completed eight prenatal care visits. Thus, we divided the group of mothers into two groups: those who had fewer than eight antenatal visits and those who had eight or more visits.

The IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 program (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to analyze the data. The data were given as median (min–max), mean (standard deviation), and number (percent).

The data were processed using both primary characters and modified characters (categorized). Most of the findings were statistically significant, and the analysis included important discoveries that were related to the collected empirical data. The χ2 independence test, with a significance level of 0.05, was used to assess the frequency of individual variations of characteristics in the analyzed groups and subgroups. The Student’s t-test was used to compare the arithmetic means of continuous variables. The odds ratio, or, was used to compare the frequency of social and anamnestic variables in the adolescent mothers and mothers from the reference group.

3. Results

Data were available for 2434 pregnancies for this analysis. A total of 294 (12.1%) of these births included teenagers between the ages of 14 and 19. The controls were 27.9 ± 3.9 years old on average, whereas the adolescents’ mean age was 17.4 ± 1.4. Table 1 displays the characteristics of the study’s participants.

Table 1

Characteristics of the sample by maternal age.

Numbers in bold indicate statistically significant values.

Table 2

Antennal care received by the respondents.

Numbers in bold indicate statistically significant values.

Table 3

OR of various risk variables for adolescent mothers’ reproductive outcomes.

OR—odds ratio; CI—confidence interval. Numbers in bold indicate statistically significant values.

Table 4 shows the results for newborns. Infants born to teenage mothers had a significantly higher rate of low birth weight than those born to women who were adults (p < 0.001). Our findings showed that children born to teenage mothers weighed less on average (−332.6 g, p < 0.001). In contrast to the control group, pregnant adolescents in our analysis had a higher prevalence of premature births (p = 0.004). Children of adolescent mothers had a lower first-minute Apgar score (p = 0.003).

Table 4

Numbers in bold indicate statistically significant values.

4. Discussion

Pregnancy in adolescence is a health problem worldwide. Teenagers themselves are a high-risk group in need of high-priority interventions. In general, most pregnancies in adolescence are extra-marital and unintended [2]. The teenage mothers in this research were more likely to be single (OR = 14.2; 95% CI = 9.3–21.6; p < 0.001), which is similar to previous studies [5,8,9,10].

In our study, preterm births were more common among pregnant teenage mothers than in controls (p = 0.004), which is similar to previous studies [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Due to the fact that preterm birth is a complex pregnancy problem, it is complicated to identify the exact cause. According to Debiec et al. [17], preterm birth is more common in teenagers who receive insufficient prenatal care, which supports the hypothesis that poor prenatal care is a risk factor for preterm birth. However, Chen et al. [4] point out that the risk of preterm birth persisted even in women who received adequate prenatal care. Yadav et al. [10] found that preterm birth was significantly more common in teenagers. According to them, the rise might be attributed to biological immaturity and socioeconomic deprivation. Clinically indicated preterm births may be the result of medical conditions such as intrauterine growth restriction or spontaneous labor. Both spontaneous preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction are associated with maternal malnutrition, and there is strong evidence linking both conditions to maternal smoking during pregnancy [13,18,31,32,33,34,35]. Adolescent mothers are more likely to deliver preterm due to gynecological immaturity (such as a short cervix [25 mm] and a small uterine volume) and susceptibility to subclinical infections. Other studies suggest that these risks are related to biological immaturity in adolescent females and are not related to social deprivation, smoking, or inadequate prenatal care [27,36,37].

Extremely underweight newborns have a higher risk of death within the first few months of life [12] as well as long-term problems with their physical and cognitive development [9,11]. Extremely low birth weight was not more common in our study cohort of adolescent mothers (p = 0.246).

The term Apgar, or appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration, was created by Doctor Virginia Apgar. This score is a simple method for evaluating neonates one and five minutes after birth. A newborn’s Apgar score is determined by several variables, including color, heart rate, reflexes, muscle tone, and breathing. Scores for each item range from 0 (zero), 1, or 2, with a total score of 7 to 10 considered good [41]. No significant difference in the low Apgar score between adolescent and adult pregnancies was found when compared with hospital-based retrospective cohort research in Nepal by Yadav et al. [10]. Due to several sociodemographic, obstetric, and dietary factors, low Apgar scores occur more frequently in teenage pregnancies than in adult pregnancies [3,22]. In a study conducted over 6 years in Japan with 30,831 women under the age of 25 who were pregnant with a singleton, Ogawa et al. [29] examined the relationship between adolescent pregnancy and adverse outcomes. They found that low Apgar scores were significantly more common among adolescent mothers than among mothers aged 20 to 24 [29]. Low Apgar scores are associated with infant complications such as breathing difficulties, feeding problems, hypothermia, and seizures [42]. Low Apgar scores at five minutes correlate with mortality and may indicate a higher likelihood of cerebral palsy [41]. In our study, the difference in the prevalence of low Apgar scores between adolescent mothers and the control group was confirmed only when the Apgar score was evaluated after the first minute (p = 0.003).

The development of social policy can be improved by having a thorough understanding of all these socioeconomic factors that influence teen pregnancy.

The first and most important step in strategies to reduce adolescent pregnancies and associated poor neonatal outcomes should be to “prevent it”. Measures to reduce the prevalence of teenage pregnancy also include increasing the importance of education. Although there are many different techniques to prevent a young girl from becoming pregnant, sexual abstinence is the only one that is 100% successful. This approach is the only one that ensures zero pregnancy risk and safeguards the adolescent from contracting any STDs. It is important to make teenagers aware of the responsibility that comes with sexual activity. The more information teenagers receive about this topic, the higher the chance that they will behave cautiously.

Teenagers should be educated about the negative consequences of teenage pregnancy, especially by their parents and at school. Building adolescents’ knowledge, skills, resilience, and aspirations through relationships and education helps them delay sexual activity until they are ready; enjoy healthy, consensual relationships; and use family planning methods. Schools may play a role by encouraging students to make mature decisions about their sex and by disseminating the knowledge needed to prevent adolescent pregnancy.

Teenagers are more likely to have their first sexual experience later in life if they and their parents have open discussions about relationships and sexual health from a young age. When parents spend time discussing sex and family planning with their children, they can have a significant impact on their decisions. Some parents have trouble talking about this topic. The barriers to parental communication include embarrassment, concern that discussion may encourage early sexual activity, and uncertainty about how to properly answer questions. Parents and all practitioners who come into contact with young people therefore need guidance on how to talk to them.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, pregnancies in adolescents should be considered high-risk pregnancies. It is necessary to emphasize the need for comprehensive prenatal care for pregnant adolescent children because insufficient prenatal care can be harmful to both the mother and her fetus. Promoting early and thorough prenatal care is a key strategy if adolescent pregnancy outcomes are to be improved. Addressing teen pregnancy also requires a major effort by families, service providers, schools, faith-based and community organizations, recreation centers, policymakers, and youth. Teenagers should be educated about the negative consequences of teenage pregnancy, especially by their parents and at school. Our results confirm the relatively high prevalence of pregnant adolescent girls who smoked. Education should therefore also focus more on the risks associated with the use of substances during pregnancy.

The most important elements in preventing unwanted teenage pregnancies are a functional and stable family, good relations between parents, and good relations between parents and children. Parents should be the main source of information about sex. Adolescent pregnancy is not only a medical problem but also a social and societal problem, so society also plays an important role in preventing unwanted pregnancies, spreading awareness among young people, and holding them accountable for their actions.

6. Limitation

The conclusions of this study must be interpreted in light of limitations in the dataset and study design. For example, this study cannot adequately control for such factors as infectious exposure and drug use, which may differ between the groups.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants KEGA No. 008UPJŠ-4/2020, KEGA 010UPJŠ-4/2021 of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovakia and 015UK-4/2022. We also thank the directory board of the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics at Louis Pasteur University Hospital in Košice for assistance with organization of sample collection at the hospital wards.

Author Contributions

J.D., K.R. and P.U. designed the project; J.D. and A.H. participated in data analysis; J.D. was responsible for interpretation and writing of the final version for publication; K.R. and E.D. were responsible for funding acquisition and project administration; J.D. performed the literature search and drafted sections of the manuscript; K.R., E.D. and Ľ.A. provided critical revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Louis Pasteur University Hospital, Košice, Slovakia, 2019/EK/2014.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

2. Melekoğlu N.A., Saraç U. Evaluation of the effect of maternal adolescent age on neonatal outcomes. Cumhuriyet Med. J. 2022; 44 :192–197. doi: 10.7197/cmj.1127605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Maheshwari M.V., Khalid N., Patel P.D., Alghareeb R., Hussain A. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Adolescent Pregnancy: A Narrative Review. Cureus. 2022; 14 :e25921. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25921. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Chen X.K., Wen S.W., Fleming N., Demissie K., Rhoads G.G., Walker M. Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: A large population based retrospective cohort study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2007; 36 :368–373. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl284. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Shawky S., Milaat W. Early teenage marriage and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. East Mediterr. Health J. 2000; 6 :46–54. doi: 10.26719/2000.6.1.46. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. UNICEF Early Childbearing. [(accessed on 16 January 2023)]. Available online: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-health/adolescent-health/

7. Barnet B., Liu J., DeVoe M., Duggan A.K., Gold M.A., Pecukonis E. Motivational intervention to reduce rapid subsequent births to adolescent mothers: A community-base randomized trial. Ann. Fam. Med. 2009; 7 :436–445. doi: 10.1370/afm.1014. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

8. Kawakita T., Wilson K., Grantz K.L., Landy H.J., Huang C.C., Gomez-Lobo V. Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Adolescent Pregnancy. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2016; 29 :130–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.08.006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Omar K., Hasim S., Muhammad N.A., Jaffar A., Hashim S.M., Siraj H.H. Adolescent pregnancy outcomes and risk factors in Malaysia. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2010; 111 :220–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.06.023. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Yadav S., Choudhary D., Narayan K.C., Mandal R.K., Sharma A., Chauhan S.S., Agrawal P. Adverse reproductive outcomes associated with teenage pregnancy. Mcgill. J. Med. 2008; 11 :141–144. doi: 10.26443/mjm.v11i2.600. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

11. Koniak-Griffin D., Turner-Pluta C. Health risks and psychosocial outcomes of early childbearing: A review of the literature. J. Perinat. Neonatal. Nurs. 2001; 15 :1–17. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200109000-00002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Lao T.T., Ho L.F. The obstetric implications of teenage pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 1997; 12 :2303–2305. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.10.2303. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Karataşlı V., Kanmaz A.G., İnan A.H., Budak A., Beyan E. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of adolescent pregnancy. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2019; 48 :347–350. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.02.011. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Usynina A.A., Postoev V., Odland J.Ø., Grjibovski A.M. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes among Adolescents in Northwest Russia: A Population Registry-Based Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018; 15 :261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020261. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Mahavarkar S.H., Madhu C.K., Mule V.D. A comparative study of teenage pregnancy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2008; 28 :604–607. doi: 10.1080/01443610802281831. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. Minjares-Granillo R.O., Reza-López S.A., Caballero-Valdez S., Levario-Carrillo M., Chávez-Corral D.V. Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Among Adolescents and Mature Women: A Hospital-Based Study in the North of Mexico. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2016; 29 :304–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.11.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. Debiec K.E., Paul K.J., Mitchell C.M., Hitti J.E. Inadequate prenatal care and risk of preterm delivery among adolescents: A retrospective study over 10 years. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 203 :122–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

18. Ukil D., Esen U.I. Early teenage pregnancy outcome: A comparison between a standard and a dedicated teenage antenatal clinic. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2002; 22 :270–272. doi: 10.1080/01443610220130544. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

19. Torvie A.J., Callegari L.S., Schiff M.A., Debiec K.E. Labor and delivery outcomes among young adolescents. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 213 :95.e1–95.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.024. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Kirbas A., Gulerman H.C., Daglar K. Pregnancy in Adolescence: Is It an Obstetrical Risk? J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2016; 29 :367–371. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.12.010. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Medhi R., Das B., Das A., Ahmed M., Bawri S., Rai S. Adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcome in adolescent mothers associated with first birth: A hospital-based case-control study in a tertiary care hospital in North-East India. Adolesc. Health Med. Ther. 2016; 7 :37–42. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S91853. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Kassa G.M., Arowojolu A.O., Odukogbe A.A., Yalew A.W. Adverse neonatal outcomes of adolescent pregnancy in Northwest Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2019; 13 :e0218259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218259. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. De Vienne C.M., Creveuil C., Dreyfus M. Does young maternal age increase the risk of adverse obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcomes: A cohort study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2009; 147 :151–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.08.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Quinlivan J.A., Evans S.F. Teenage antenatal clinics may reduce the rate of preterm birth: A prospective study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2004; 111 :571–578. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00146.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Ozdemirci S., Kasapoglu T., Cirik D.A., Yerebasmaz N., Kayikcioglu F., Salgur F. Is late adolescence a real risk factor for an adverse outcome of pregnancy? J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29 :3391–3394. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1130814. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Blomberg M., Birch Tyrberg R., Kjølhede P. Impact of maternal age on obstetric and neonatal outcome with emphasis on primiparous adolescents and older women: A Swedish Medical Birth Register Study. BMJ Open. 2014; 4 :e005840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005840. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Ganchimeg T., Ota E., Morisaki N., Laopaiboon M., Lumbiganon P., Zhang J., Yamdamsuren B., Temmerman M., Say L., Tunçalp Ö., et al. Pregnancy and childbirth outcomes among adolescent mothers: A World Health Organization multicountry study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014; 121 :40–48. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12630. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Malabarey O.T., Balayla J., Klam S.L., Shrim A., Abenhaim H.A. Pregnancies in young adolescent mothers: A population-based study on 37 million births. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2012; 25 :98–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.09.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

29. Ogawa K., Matsushima S., Urayama K.Y., Kikuchi N., Nakamura N., Tanigaki S., Sago H., Satoh S., Saito S., Morisaki N. Association between adolescent pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes, a multicenter cross sectional Japanese study. Sci. Rep. 2019; 9 :2365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38999-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. Rexhepi M., Besimi F., Rufati N., Alili A., Bajrami S., Ismaili H. Hospital-based study of maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnancy compared to adult women pregnancy. Open Access. Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2019; 7 :760–766. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.210. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Kukla L., Hrubá D., Tyrlík M. European Longitudinal Study of the Pregnancy and childhood. Smoking and damages of reproduction: Evidence of ELSPAC. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health. 2001; 9 :59–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Dejmek J., Solansky I., Podrazilová K., Srám R.J. The exposure of nonsmoking and smoking mothers to environmental tobacco smoke during different gestational phases and fetal growth. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002; 110 :601–606. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110601. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Goonewardene I.M., Deeyagaha Waduge R.P. Adverse effects of teenage pregnancy. Ceylon Med. J. 2005; 50 :116–120. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v50i3.1428. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Brosens I., Muter J., Gargett C.E., Puttemans P., Benagiano G., Brosens J.J. The impact of uterine immaturity on obstetrical syndromes during adolescence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 217 :546–555. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.059. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Gibbs C.M., Wendt A., Peters S., Hogue C.J. The impact of early age at first childbirth on maternal and infant health. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2012; 26 :259–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01290.x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. Gilbert W., Jandial D., Field N., Bigelow P., Danielsen B. Birth outcomes in teenage pregnancies. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004; 16 :265–270. doi: 10.1080/jmf.16.5.265.270. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Stevens-Simon C., Beach R.K., McGregor J.A. Does Incomplete Growth and Development Predispose Teenagers to Preterm Delivery? A Template for Research. J. Perinatol. 2002; 22 :315–323. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210694. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

38. Karabulut A., Ozkan S., Bozkurt A.I., Karahan T., Kayan S. Perinatal outcomes and risk factors in adolescent and advanced age pregnancies: Comparison with normal reproductive age women. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013; 33 :346–350. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.767786. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

39. Chantrapanichkul P., Chawanpaiboon S. Adverse pregnancy outcomes in cases involving extremely young maternal age. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2013; 120 :160–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.08.024. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

40. Marvin-Dowle K., Kilner K., Burley V.J., Soltani H. Impact of adolescent age on maternal and neonatal outcomes in the Born in Bradford cohort. BMJ Open. 2018; 8 :e016258. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016258. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. Simon L.V., Hashmi M.F., Bragg B.N. APGAR Score. 2022. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2022. [Google Scholar]

42. Thavarajah H., Flatley C., Kumar S. The relationship between the five minute Apgar score, mode of birth and neonatal outcomes. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 31 :1335–1341. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1315666. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)